Skip to main content
LakeQuality
B

Moose Lake

Itasca County, MinnesotaLimited DataMesotrophic

Moose Lake comes in at a B on the grading rubric — a respectable showing for a Minnesota lake of its size and depth. Clarity, phosphorus, and chlorophyll-a all rate similarly, so there is no obvious single lever to pull on watershed management.

A TSI near 42 places Moose Lake in the mesotrophic band — moderate productivity, with seasonal swings between clearer spring water and richer late-summer conditions. The lake's 61 ft maximum depth is in the upper tier for Minnesota — deep enough for cold-water fish to find refuge in summer. Moose Lake covers 1,273 acres alongside 7.3 miles of shoreline, large enough that conditions can vary meaningfully between bays. Moose Lake ranks 65 of 141 in Itasca County — solidly in the upper half of the local distribution.

Zebra mussels have been documented at Moose Lake, which alters the filter-feeding balance and can paradoxically increase water clarity while disrupting the food web. Moose Lake's fishery is anchored by muskellunge, with 17 documented species in total — a destination water for muskie anglers. A documented public access point at Moose Lake makes the lake usable for shore fishing, paddle craft, and trailered boats. The grade is based on limited monitoring — fewer than three independent measurement years contribute, so future updates may shift the letter.

Source: EPA Water Quality Portal sampling records, Minnesota DNR LakeFinder, last sampled 2024-10-21. Grade methodology: LakeGrade methodology.

Swimming Safety

Good for swimming, clear water with low algae levels

Water Quality Grade: B, Good

Good clarity, visible to about 11.5 ft. Trophic State Index: 42.

MetricValueGrade
Water Clarity (Secchi Depth)11.5 ftB
PhosphorusNo data
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)No data
Trophic State Index (TSI)42Mesotrophic

Moderate nutrients, good water quality

Lake Details

CharacteristicValue
Maximum Depth61 ft
Surface Area1.3K acres
Shoreline Length7.3 mi
Littoral Zone27%
Public AccessYes

Fish Species

Click a species to see all Minnesota and Wisconsin lakes where it is found.

→ Best fishing times for Moose Lake (14-day solunar calendar)

→ Is it safe to eat fish from Moose Lake? (mercury & PFAS guide)

Moose Lake fishing regulations (limits, seasons, special rules)

Invasive Species

zebra mussel

Water Quality Trend: Improving

Based on 5 years of monitoring data (2020-2025).

MetricTrendChange/YearYears
Water Clarity Improving+0.175 m/yr5

Location

Loading map…

County Ranking

Ranked #65 of 141 lakes in Itasca County

Nearby Lakes in Itasca County

DNR Fisheries Survey Summary

27 surveys on file from MN DNR Fisheries. Most recent: 2025-08-06 (Targeted Survey).

Top Species by Catch Rate

SpeciesAvg CPUEAvg Weight
Yellow Perch32.180.18 lb
Bluntnose Minnow17.43
OTM15.25
CNM11.98
MMS10.20
Tullibee (Cisco)9.720.78 lb

CPUE = catch per unit effort, averaged across surveys (excludes juvenile shoreline seining). Higher CPUE = more abundant in standardized sampling.

Length Distributions

Number of fish caught at each inch class in the most recent survey that recorded lengths. Red dashed line marks an approximate trophy threshold for that species.

Yellow Perch

475 fish · 59 in · 2023-08-21
347174056789

Tullibee (Cisco)

111 fish · 612 in · 2023-08-21
522606789101112

From the 2025-08-06 survey

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Moose Lake on August 6th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake.…

Source: MN DNR LakeFinder Fisheries Lake Survey

DNR Reports & Resources

Minnesota DNR LakeFinder publishes lake survey, fish stocking, water access, and aquatic plant data for Moose Lake. 4 reports on file.

Data Sources

Water quality data from the EPA Water Quality Portal

Grading methodology based on Metropolitan Council standards

Lake details from Minnesota DNR LakeFinder

Most recent sample: 2024-10-21

Monitoring stations: 2