Lake Climate & Long-Term Trends
Which lakes across our 38 covered states are getting cleaner — and which are getting worse. Trends calculated from EPA Water Quality Portal samples, year by year. Every lake page links to a full chart with sources.
Most improving
Largest relative improvement per year on any single metric.
- AHerkimer County, New York · Phosphorus↑ Improving-12.05 µg/L/yr
- CScott County, Iowa · Chlorophyll-a↑ Improving-51.81 µg/L/yr
- CScott County, Iowa · Chlorophyll-a↑ Improving-51.81 µg/L/yr
- CScott County, Iowa · Chlorophyll-a↑ Improving-51.81 µg/L/yr
- CScott County, Iowa · Chlorophyll-a↑ Improving-51.81 µg/L/yr
- BPinellas County, Florida · Phosphorus↑ Improving-28.55 µg/L/yr
- AChisago County, Minnesota · Chlorophyll-a↑ Improving-8.81 µg/L/yr
- AWindham County, Vermont · Chlorophyll-a↑ Improving-1.89 µg/L/yr
- CPolk County, Wisconsin · Chlorophyll-a↑ Improving-12.08 µg/L/yr
- CCarlton County, Minnesota · Water Clarity↑ Improving+1.96 m/yr
- CChittenden County, Vermont · Chlorophyll-a↑ Improving-4.14 µg/L/yr
- DOneida County, Wisconsin · Water Clarity↑ Improving+1.52 m/yr
Most declining
Largest relative decline per year on any single metric.
- DJohnson County, Iowa · Phosphorus↓ Declining+92.60 µg/L/yr
- BJasper County, Iowa · Phosphorus↓ Declining+51.35 µg/L/yr
- ACarlton County, Minnesota · Phosphorus↓ Declining+75.10 µg/L/yr
- ACarlton County, Minnesota · Phosphorus↓ Declining+74.60 µg/L/yr
- CCarlton County, Minnesota · Phosphorus↓ Declining+74.00 µg/L/yr
- CSt. Louis County, Minnesota · Phosphorus↓ Declining+74.30 µg/L/yr
- CScott County, Iowa · Phosphorus↓ Declining+43.20 µg/L/yr
- BAdair County, Iowa · Phosphorus↓ Declining+37.20 µg/L/yr
- BSt. Louis County, Minnesota · Phosphorus↓ Declining+73.05 µg/L/yr
- CCarlton County, Minnesota · Phosphorus↓ Declining+72.65 µg/L/yr
- DGuthrie County, Iowa · Phosphorus↓ Declining+69.90 µg/L/yr
- DJones County, Iowa · Phosphorus↓ Declining+74.25 µg/L/yr
Methodology
- Data: EPA Water Quality Portal — secchi depth, total phosphorus, and chlorophyll-a samples.
- Annual values: median of all samples for that lake in that year.
- Trend fit: linear regression across annual medians; classified improving, declining, or stable when change/year is below 2% of the long-run mean.
- Eligibility: lakes with at least four years of data on the metric being ranked.
- Limitation: the current sample window is short (~2020–2025). Treat trends as direction, not certainty. We will revisit this page as the sample window widens.
Looking for a single lake? Open any lake page from Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Iowa, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Missouri, Indiana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Florida, Colorado, North Carolina, Vermont, Texas, Oregon, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Tennessee, Alabama, Virginia, Kentucky, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Georgia, Massachusetts, Ontario, Québec and follow the Trends link.