Mead Lake
Clark County, WisconsinHypereutrophic
On the LakeGrade rubric Mead Lake fails the cutoffs — a TSI of 74 and persistent algal pressure put it in the bottom tier. The two scored sub-grades — clarity and phosphorus — track close together, so neither one is dragging the average down.
A TSI above 70 puts Mead Lake in hypereutrophic territory: visible blooms are common, and clarity rarely climbs even in early summer. A maximum depth of 16 ft puts Mead Lake in the middle of Wisconsin's depth distribution. The lake's 310 acres and partial shoreline records put it in the mid-range bucket — large enough for varied use, small enough that watershed inputs reach the whole basin. Mead Lake ranks 2 of 4 in Clark County — solidly in the upper half of the local distribution.
An invasive species record — Curly-Leaf Pondweed — has been logged at Mead Lake; Wisconsin DNR maintains the official infested-waters list. The fishery includes walleye among the lake's 5 documented species — a notable draw for Wisconsin anglers. The grade is based on limited monitoring — fewer than three independent measurement years contribute, so future updates may shift the letter.
Source: EPA Water Quality Portal sampling records, Wisconsin DNR Surface Water, last sampled 2025-08-27. Grade methodology: LakeGrade methodology.
Track Mead Lake
Subscribe for LakeQuality updates by email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Swimming Safety
Avoid swimming, very poor water quality, potential algae toxins
Water Quality Grade: F, Very Poor
Very murky, less than 2 ft of visibility. Phosphorus level: 208 µg/L. Trophic State Index: 74.
| Metric | Value | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity (Secchi Depth) | 2 ft | F |
| Phosphorus | 208 µg/L | F |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | |
| Trophic State Index (TSI) | 74 | Hypereutrophic |
Very high nutrients, dense algae, poor clarity
Lake Details
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Maximum Depth | 16 ft |
| Surface Area | 310 acres |
Fish Species
Click a species to see all Wisconsin and Minnesota lakes where it is found.
→ Best fishing times for Mead Lake (14-day solunar calendar)
→ Is it safe to eat fish from Mead Lake? (mercury & PFAS guide)
→ Mead Lake fishing regulations (limits, seasons, special rules)
Invasive & Introduced Species
Red chips are ecologically harmful invasive species. Gray chips are stocked or introduced fish that aren't a current ecological concern.
Water Quality Trend: → Stable
Based on 5 years of monitoring data (2020-2025).
| Metric | Trend | Change/Year | Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | ↓ Declining | -0.114 m/yr | 4 |
| Phosphorus | ↑ Improving | -36.5 µg/L/yr | 3 |
Location
County Ranking
Ranked #2 of 4 lakes in Clark County
Cleaner Lakes Within 30 Miles
Mead Lake holds Grade F. 2 nearby lakes hold higher grades.
- DLake WissotaChippewa County · mi · Higher grade (F → D)
- DEau Claire LakeEau Claire County · mi · Higher grade (F → D)
Nearby Lakes in Clark County
More Wisconsin Lake Rankings
Other Grade F Lakes in Wisconsin
Hypereutrophic Lakes in Wisconsin
WI DNR Lake Profile
Authoritative data from the Wisconsin DNR LakePages. Monitored by volunteers since 1996. 6 stations on file (most recent sample 2025).
Fish Species (DNR-rated)
Reservoir Info (USACE NID)
Mead Lake is a man-made reservoir impounded by the Mead (completed 1951), built primarily for recreation on the SOUTH FORK EAU CLAIRE RIVER; earth-type dam, 28 ft tall and 1,600 ft long.
- Surface area
- 320 ac
- Normal storage
- 1,534 ac-ft
- Max storage
- 4,000 ac-ft
- Drainage area
- 108.2 sq mi
- Hazard class
- Low
- Owner
- Clark County
Source: USACE National Inventory of Dams, NID ID WI00067 · Operator website
EPA Impairment Status
Mead Lake is officially listed as impaired under Clean Water Act §303(d) in the 2024 EPA reporting cycle (IR category 4A).
Causes of impairment
A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) plan has been approved.
Source: EPA ATTAINS assessment unit WI10004701 · Official waterbody report
Data Sources
Water quality data from the EPA Water Quality Portal
Impairment status from EPA ATTAINS 303(d) database
Grading methodology based on Metropolitan Council standards
Most recent sample: 2025-08-27
Monitoring stations: 3