Upper Prior Lake
- ++2.7 ft water clarity
- +Lower phosphorus (38.7 vs 71 µg/L)

3 lakes with lower nutrient and algae readings nearby, ranked by the size of the improvement and by proximity.
Mcmahon Lake carries nutrient and algae readings on record. Within 30 miles, 3 lakes read lower. Upper Prior Lake (Scott County) is the closest meaningful upgrade.
Stays via Stay22
Compare cabins, hotels, and vacation rentals around Mcmahon Lake in Minnesota. The 3 lakes above sit within 30 miles, so one base reaches them all. Switch the map to Satellite to see how close each stay is to the water.
Top-rated places to stay near Mcmahon Lake
Prices for Oct 9–11, 4 adults. Change dates on the map below.
Availability and prices from Stay22 partners (Booking.com, Vrbo, Expedia). We may earn a commission from bookings, at no extra cost to you.
Planning a trip to Mcmahon Lake?
Get lake water-quality updates plus the best cabin & lodging deals near Mcmahon Lake — straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Within 30 miles of Mcmahon Lake, 3 lakes carry lower nutrient and algae readings on the EPA water-quality metrics. The short list means the alternatives are real upgrades but not interchangeable: each carries its own access, size, and species mix worth checking before substituting it into a weekend plan.
The closest cleaner alternative, Upper Prior Lake in Scott County, sits miles from Mcmahon Lake. At that distance, the substitution cost is essentially zero: same drive time, same regional access, demonstrably cleaner water on the EPA indicators. For repeat visitors who care about clarity or phosphorus levels, swapping the routine to Upper Prior Lake is mostly a habit change rather than a logistics change.
Each lake's nutrient and algae readings — total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity — are shown beside the EPA National Lakes Assessment 2022 condition class for that lake's own ecoregion, so a reading is compared against the lakes it would naturally resemble. LakeQuality publishes no letter grade. Lower readings mean measurably less nutrient and algae in the water, not better scenery or access: the lake with the clearest, lowest-nutrient water can have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a neighbor, so the comparison is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. How the readings are classified is on our methodology page.
Sampled lakes on LakeQuality carry readings from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with strictly lower nutrient and algae readings, then rank by the size of the improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.