Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Published May 26, 2026 · Updated August 18, 2026

The Lakes Where Water Quality Is Slipping

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated
Murky Lake Shoreline — illustrative photo
Photo: Alexander NerozyaPexels License via source

3,133 lakes with enough history to judge show a declining water-quality trend across the 39 states and 2 Canadian provinces we track— currently led by Round Lake (MN). The 15 below carry the clearest downward signal. The letter is nutrients and algae; the trend still watches Secchi too.

Lakes with the steepest declines

A declining lake is one where the long-term direction of the data is worsening — not a lake that had one bad summer. The lakes below combine a low current grade with a documented downward trend across several years ofSecchi depth, phosphorus, and chlorophyll-a readings.

LakeStateCountyGradeYears of data
Round LakeMNItascaF2
Horseshoe LakeMNStearnsF4
Long LakeMNStearnsF6
Long LakeMNKandiyohiF4
Long LakeMNHennepinF6
Clear LakeMNMeekerF6
Clear LakeMNWasecaF5
Clear LakeMNJacksonF2
Eagle LakeMNHennepinF6
Eagle LakeMNCarverF6
Fish LakeMNWrightF6
Washington LakeMNLe SueurF6
East Solomon LakeMNKandiyohiF5
Norway LakeMNKandiyohiF6
East Auburn LakeMNCarverF6

The "years of data" column matters: a decline backed by a decade of sampling is a far stronger signal than one drawn from three or four seasons. Open any lake to see the year-by-year clarity and nutrient charts behind its trend.

How we detect a trend

A trend is a direction, not a snapshot. We look at a lake's repeated measurements over multiple years and ask whether the available tracks are moving the wrong way. Specifically, the overall trend is a majority vote of three series when they exist: Secchi depth (clarity), total phosphorus (the nutrient that feeds algae), and chlorophyll-a (the algae itself). That is different from the letter grade, which scores phosphorus, nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity against EPA ecoregion classes and does not score Secchi. A lake can lose feet of clarity and still hold its letter until nutrients and algae catch up — which is why the trend table is worth reading next to the grade. Lakes without enough repeated sampling are left untrended. The full approach is on the methodology page and in Lake Water Quality Grades Explained.

What drives a lake downhill

Declines are a nutrient story. Phosphorus is the master variable in most freshwater lakes: add more of it and algae grows, clarity drops, and the grade falls. The common sources are consistent across states:

  • Watershed development — new rooftops, roads, and lawns replace forest and wetland, sending more stormwater and nutrients straight to the water.
  • Agricultural runoff — fertilizer and manure phosphorus washing off row crops and pasture, the dominant driver in agricultural basins.
  • Failing septic and aging wastewater — nutrient leakage from shoreline homes and undersized treatment upstream.
  • Invasive species — infestations that disrupt the food web and, in some lakes, release sediment-bound phosphorus back into the water.
  • Warmer, longer summers — higher water temperatures extend the growing season for cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) and intensify blooms.

These forces rarely act alone. A lake ringed by new development in an agricultural county, warming year over year, is exposed to all of them at once — which is why declines cluster geographically rather than scattering at random.

The other side of the ledger

Decline is not destiny. For every lake slipping, others are recovering because their watersheds are sending less phosphorus downstream. 3,162 lakes in our data show improving trends, and the clearest success stories now hold A or B grades while still trending upward. If you want the hopeful version of this data, read the lakes that made the biggest comeback and browse the full improving-lakes ranking. To see the complete list of lakes headed the wrong way, open the declining-lakes ranking.

Frequently Asked Questions

A lake is flagged as declining only when it has at least two years of repeated monitoring. The overall trend is a majority vote across available Secchi, phosphorus, and chlorophyll-a tracks — so a drop in clarity can move the trend even though Secchi is not in the A–F letter. A single bad sample is not a trend.

Across the 39 states and 2 Canadian provinces we track, 3,133 lakes with enough history to judge show a declining water-quality trend, versus 3,162 that are improving. Most lakes with long records are holding steady; declines are the minority but they concentrate in predictable places.

Declines almost always trace back to more nutrients reaching the water: new shoreline development, intensifying agricultural runoff, failing septic systems, and stormwater from expanding impervious surfaces. Invasive species and warmer, longer summers accelerate the effect by extending the algae season.

Yes. Water quality responds to nutrient reduction, so lakes that cut phosphorus inputs — through wastewater upgrades, shoreline buffers, or farm best-management practices — can reverse a decline over several years. Recovery is slow but real, as the comeback lakes show.

/methodology

Track lake water-quality trends by email

New trend analysis and rankings as we publish them. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.