Skip to main content
LakeQuality

East Graham Lake vs Okabena Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Okabena Lake has a higher water quality grade (D, Nutrient-rich) than East Graham Lake (F, Algae-prone). Both are in Nobles County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both East Graham Lake and Okabena Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. The grades are close: East Graham Lake (F) and Okabena Lake (D) are within one letter of each other on the LakeGrade rubric. The per-parameter sub-grades below will show where the small differences actually live.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

F

East Graham Lake

Nobles County, Minnesota

Very murky, less than 3.3 ft of visibility.

D

Okabena Lake

Nobles County, Minnesota

Very murky, less than 3.3 ft of visibility.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricEast Graham LakeOkabena Lake
Overall GradeF (Algae-prone)D (Nutrient-rich) Better
Water Clarity3.3 ft3.3 ft
Phosphorus184 µg/L166.5 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)80.1 µg/L24.1 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth8 ft16 ft Better
Surface Area511 acres776 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1518 Better
Trophic Statehypereutrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Okabena Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade D versus East Graham Lake's Grade F. Water clarity: 3.3 ft vs 3.3 ft. For fishing diversity, Okabena Lake also leads with 18 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.