Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Pokegama Lake vs Rush Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Pokegama Lake and Rush Lake both received the same overall water quality grade of F (Very Poor). Both are in Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Pokegama Lake and Rush Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Pokegama Lake (F) versus Rush Lake (F). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

F

Pokegama Lake

Pine County, Minnesota

Very murky, less than 2 ft of visibility.

F

Rush Lake

Chisago County, Minnesota

Very murky, less than 3 ft of visibility.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricPokegama LakeRush Lake
Overall GradeF (Very Poor)F (Very Poor)
Water Clarity2 ft3 ft
Phosphorus170 µg/L55.5 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)46.8 µg/L31.4 µg/L
Maximum Depth25 ft24 ft
Surface Area1,521 acres1,494 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species2316
Trophic Statehypereutrophiceutrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade F. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Pokegama Lake: 2 ft, Rush Lake: 3 ft) and what you want from the lake. Pokegama Lake supports more documented fish species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.