Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Little Birch Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Osakis Lake. Both are in Todd County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Little Birch Lake and Osakis Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The readings are meaningfully apart: Little Birch Lake carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Osakis Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Little Birch Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Little Birch Lake

Todd County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 13 ft.

Osakis Lake

Todd County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 10.5 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricLittle Birch LakeOsakis Lake
Water Clarity13 ft Better10.5 ft
Phosphorus19 µg/L Better75 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)3.1 µg/L Better9.6 µg/L
Maximum Depth89 ft Better73 ft
Surface Area839 acres6,389 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species20 Better18
Trophic Statemesotrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Little Birch Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Osakis Lake. Water clarity: 13 ft vs 10.5 ft. For fishing diversity, Little Birch Lake also leads with 20 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.