Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Horseshoe Lake and Upper Mission Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Crow Wing County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Horseshoe Lake and Upper Mission Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. These two sit close on the readings, Horseshoe Lake versus Upper Mission Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Horseshoe Lake

Crow Wing County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 14.4 ft.

Upper Mission Lake

Crow Wing County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 11 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricHorseshoe LakeUpper Mission Lake
Water Clarity14.4 ft Better11 ft
Phosphorus11 µg/L Better15.5 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)3.5 µg/L Better5.1 µg/L
Maximum Depth56 ft Better36 ft
Surface Area922 acres882 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1113 Better
Trophic Statemesotrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Horseshoe Lake: 14.4 ft, Upper Mission Lake: 11 ft) and what you want from the lake. Horseshoe Lake has fewer fish species than Upper Mission Lake.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.