Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Frances Lake vs Gorman Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Frances Lake has a higher water quality grade (D, Nutrient-rich) than Gorman Lake (F, Algae-prone). Both are in Le Sueur County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Frances Lake and Gorman Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Frances Lake (D) versus Gorman Lake (F). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

D

Frances Lake

Le Sueur County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 6 ft.

F

Gorman Lake

Le Sueur County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 3.7 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricFrances LakeGorman Lake
Overall GradeD (Nutrient-rich) BetterF (Algae-prone)
Water Clarity6 ft Better3.7 ft
Phosphorus23 µg/L Better531.5 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)20.6 µg/L Better47 µg/L
Maximum Depth60 ft Better14 ft
Surface Area927 acres521 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1616
Trophic Stateeutrophichypereutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Frances Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade D versus Gorman Lake's Grade F. Water clarity: 6 ft vs 3.7 ft. For fishing diversity, Frances Lake also leads with 16 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.