Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Minnewaska Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Emily Lake. Both are in Pope County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Emily Lake and Minnewaska Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The readings are meaningfully apart: Minnewaska Lake carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Emily Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Minnewaska Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Emily Lake

Pope County, Minnesota

Very murky, less than 2 ft of visibility.

Minnewaska Lake

Pope County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 11 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricEmily LakeMinnewaska Lake
Water Clarity2 ft11 ft Better
Phosphorus90 µg/L24 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)24.5 µg/L6 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth6 ft32 ft Better
Surface Area2,316 acres8,050 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species26 Better21
Trophic Stateeutrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Minnewaska Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Emily Lake. Water clarity: 11 ft vs 2 ft. For more fish-species variety, Emily Lake edges ahead with 26 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.