Skip to main content
LakeQuality

West Leaf Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Rush Lake. Both are in Otter Tail County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Rush Lake and West Leaf Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. West Leaf Lake reads materially cleaner than Rush Lake on nutrients and algae. A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: West Leaf Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Rush Lake

Otter Tail County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 7.5 ft.

West Leaf Lake

Otter Tail County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 7.5 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricRush LakeWest Leaf Lake
Water Clarity7.5 ft7.5 ft
Phosphorus27 µg/L22 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)9.8 µg/L6.2 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth68 ft Better55 ft
Surface Area5,276 acres700 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species19 Better18
Trophic Stateeutrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

West Leaf Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Rush Lake. Water clarity: 7.5 ft vs 7.5 ft. For more fish-species variety, Rush Lake edges ahead with 19 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.