Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Mule Lake and Wabedo Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Cass County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Mule Lake and Wabedo Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The readings are close: Mule Lake and Wabedo Lake sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Mule Lake

Cass County, Minnesota

Crystal clear, you can see 18 ft down.

Wabedo Lake

Cass County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 10.5 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricMule LakeWabedo Lake
Water Clarity18 ft Better10.5 ft
Phosphorus10 µg/L Better16 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)2.4 µg/L Better4.9 µg/L
Maximum Depth47 ft95 ft Better
Surface Area525 acres1,226 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1119 Better
Trophic Stateoligotrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Mule Lake: 18 ft, Wabedo Lake: 10.5 ft) and what you want from the lake. Mule Lake has fewer fish species than Wabedo Lake.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.