Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Maple Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Villard Lake. Both are in Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Maple Lake and Villard Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. Maple Lake reads materially cleaner than Villard Lake on nutrients and algae. A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Maple Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Maple Lake

Douglas County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 14.1 ft.

Villard Lake

Pope County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 4.6 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricMaple LakeVillard Lake
Water Clarity14.1 ft Better4.6 ft
Phosphorus15 µg/L Better31 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)3.1 µg/L Better13 µg/L
Maximum Depth78 ft Better16 ft
Surface Area831 acres544 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species17 Better14
Trophic Statemesotrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Maple Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Villard Lake. Water clarity: 14.1 ft vs 4.6 ft. For fishing diversity, Maple Lake also leads with 17 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.