Kabekona Bay Lake vs Kabekona Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Kabekona Bay Lake and Kabekona Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Minnesota.
Kabekona Bay Lake and Kabekona Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two sit close on the readings, Kabekona Bay Lake versus Kabekona Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Kabekona Bay Lake
Crystal clear, you can see 17.2 ft down.
Kabekona Lake
Good clarity, visible to about 12.1 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Kabekona Bay Lake | Kabekona Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 17.2 ft Better | 12.1 ft |
| Phosphorus | 10 µg/L Better | 11 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 2.7 µg/L | 2.6 µg/L Better |
| Maximum Depth | 150 ft Better | 133 ft |
| Surface Area | 103,444 acres | 2,433 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 18 | 20 Better |
| Trophic State | oligotrophic | oligotrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Kabekona Bay Lake or Kabekona Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Kabekona Bay Lake: 17.2 ft, Kabekona Lake: 12.1 ft) and what you want from the lake. Kabekona Bay Lake has fewer fish species than Kabekona Lake.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.