Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Dixon Lake vs Shallow Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Shallow Lake has a higher water quality grade (A, Excellent) than Dixon Lake (D, Poor). Both are in Itasca County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Dixon Lake and Shallow Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The grades are meaningfully apart: Shallow Lake grades a A while Dixon Lake grades a D. That two-letter spread reflects real underlying differences — different watershed inputs, different depth profiles, or different monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider grade gap is decisive — Shallow Lake is the better water-quality choice. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

D

Dixon Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 6 ft.

A

Shallow Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Crystal clear, you can see 16.4 ft down.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricDixon LakeShallow Lake
Overall GradeD (Poor)A (Excellent)
Water Clarity6 ft16.4 ft
Phosphorus34 µg/L9 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)19.6 µg/L3.2 µg/L
Maximum Depth29 ft85 ft
Surface Area622 acres539 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1512
Trophic Stateeutrophicoligotrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

Shallow Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade A versus Dixon Lake's Grade D. Water clarity: 16.4 ft vs 6 ft. For more fish-species variety, Dixon Lake edges ahead with 15 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.