Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Chippewa Flowage -North of Cranberry Bars Lake and Moose Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Sawyer County, Wisconsin.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Chippewa Flowage -North of Cranberry Bars Lake and Moose Lake are both in Wisconsin — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The readings are close: Chippewa Flowage -North of Cranberry Bars Lake and Moose Lake sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Murky, only visible to about 4.9 ft.

Moose Lake

Sawyer County, Wisconsin

Very murky, less than 2 ft of visibility.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricChippewa Flowage -North of Cranberry Bars LakeMoose Lake
Water Clarity4.9 ft Better2 ft
Phosphorus32 µg/L28.9 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)10 µg/LNo data
Maximum Depth92 ft Better21 ft
Surface Area14,593 acres1,559 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species8 Better5
Trophic Stateeutrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade C. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Chippewa Flowage -North of Cranberry Bars Lake: 4.9 ft, Moose Lake: 2 ft) and what you want from the lake. Chippewa Flowage -North of Cranberry Bars Lake supports more documented fish species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.