Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Buffalo Lake and Lake Puckaway read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Wisconsin.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Buffalo Lake and Lake Puckaway sit in Wisconsin. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are close: Buffalo Lake and Lake Puckaway sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Buffalo Lake

Marquette County, Wisconsin

Very murky, less than 2.5 ft of visibility.

Lake Puckaway

Green Lake County, Wisconsin

Murky, only visible to about 4.4 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricBuffalo LakeLake Puckaway
Water Clarity2.5 ft4.4 ft Better
Phosphorus125.5 µg/L52.1 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)No dataNo data
Maximum Depth8 ft Better5 ft
Surface Area2,179 acres5,013 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species56 Better
Trophic Stateeutrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Swap a lake

Compare Buffalo Lake or Lake Puckaway against a different lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade D. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Buffalo Lake: 2.5 ft, Lake Puckaway: 4.4 ft) and what you want from the lake. Buffalo Lake has fewer fish species than Lake Puckaway.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.