Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Big Cedar Lake-North Site-Near West Bend reads lower on nutrients and algae than Pike Lake. Both are in Washington County, Wisconsin.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Big Cedar Lake-North Site-Near West Bend and Pike Lake are both in Wisconsin — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two sit close on the readings, Big Cedar Lake-North Site-Near West Bend versus Pike Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Big Cedar Lake-North Site-Near West Bend

Washington County, Wisconsin

Good clarity, visible to about 11.8 ft.

Pike Lake

Washington County, Wisconsin

Moderate clarity, visible to about 7 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricBig Cedar Lake-North Site-Near West BendPike Lake
Water Clarity11.8 ft Better7 ft
Phosphorus17.5 µg/L Better19.3 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)3.6 µg/LNo data
Maximum Depth105 ft Better45 ft
Surface Area937 acres461 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species45 Better
Trophic Statemesotrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Big Cedar Lake-North Site-Near West Bend reads lower on nutrients and algae than Pike Lake. Water clarity: 11.8 ft vs 7 ft. For more fish-species variety, Pike Lake edges ahead with 5 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.