Benedict Lake vs Kabekona Bay Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Benedict Lake and Kabekona Bay Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Minnesota.
Both Benedict Lake and Kabekona Bay Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. These two sit close on the readings, Benedict Lake versus Kabekona Bay Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Benedict Lake
Good clarity, visible to about 11.5 ft.
Kabekona Bay Lake
Crystal clear, you can see 17.2 ft down.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Benedict Lake | Kabekona Bay Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 11.5 ft | 17.2 ft Better |
| Phosphorus | 8.5 µg/L Better | 10 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 2.4 µg/L Better | 2.7 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | 91 ft | 150 ft Better |
| Surface Area | 464 acres | 103,444 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 16 | 18 Better |
| Trophic State | oligotrophic | oligotrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Benedict Lake or Kabekona Bay Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Benedict Lake: 11.5 ft, Kabekona Bay Lake: 17.2 ft) and what you want from the lake. Benedict Lake has fewer fish species than Kabekona Bay Lake.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.