Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Bad Medicine Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Upper Cormorant Lake. Both are in Becker County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Bad Medicine Lake and Upper Cormorant Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are meaningfully apart: Bad Medicine Lake carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Upper Cormorant Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Bad Medicine Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Bad Medicine Lake

Becker County, Minnesota

Crystal clear, you can see 25 ft down.

Upper Cormorant Lake

Becker County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 8 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricBad Medicine LakeUpper Cormorant Lake
Water Clarity25 ft Better8 ft
Phosphorus6 µg/L Better30 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)1.6 µg/L Better9.9 µg/L
Maximum Depth84 ft Better29 ft
Surface Area803 acres974 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1313
Trophic Stateoligotrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Bad Medicine Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Upper Cormorant Lake. Water clarity: 25 ft vs 8 ft. For fishing diversity, Bad Medicine Lake also leads with 13 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.