Star Lake vs Unnamed Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Star Lake and Unnamed Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Meeker County, Minnesota.
Star Lake and Unnamed Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The readings are close: Star Lake and Unnamed Lake sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Star Lake
Very murky, less than 1 ft of visibility.
Unnamed Lake
Very murky, less than 0.7 ft of visibility.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Star Lake | Unnamed Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 1 ft Better | 0.7 ft |
| Phosphorus | 63.5 µg/L Better | 224 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 34.7 µg/L Better | 85.4 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | 15 ft | 15 ft |
| Surface Area | 553 acres | 553 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 10 | 10 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | hypereutrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Star Lake or Unnamed Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
Both lakes earn the same Grade F. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Star Lake: 1 ft, Unnamed Lake: 0.7 ft) and what you want from the lake. Star Lake matches its peer on species count.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.