Midge Lake vs Wolf Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Midge Lake and Wolf Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Minnesota.
Midge Lake and Wolf Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two sit close on the readings, Midge Lake versus Wolf Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Midge Lake
Crystal clear, you can see 18 ft down.
Wolf Lake
Moderate clarity, visible to about 9 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Midge Lake | Wolf Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 18 ft Better | 9 ft |
| Phosphorus | 16 µg/L Better | 19 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 2.5 µg/L Better | 5.3 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | 24 ft | 57 ft Better |
| Surface Area | 546 acres | 1,076 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 11 | 18 Better |
| Trophic State | oligotrophic | mesotrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Midge Lake or Wolf Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Midge Lake: 18 ft, Wolf Lake: 9 ft) and what you want from the lake. Midge Lake has fewer fish species than Wolf Lake.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.