Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Lost Lake vs Plum Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Plum Lake has a higher water quality grade (B, Good) than Lost Lake (C, Fair). Both are in Vilas County, Wisconsin.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Lost Lake and Plum Lake are both in Wisconsin — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Lost Lake (C) versus Plum Lake (B). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

C

Lost Lake

Vilas County, Wisconsin

Murky, only visible to about 4.5 ft.

B

Plum Lake

Vilas County, Wisconsin

Good clarity, visible to about 14.2 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricLost LakePlum Lake
Overall GradeC (Fair)B (Good)
Water Clarity4.5 ft14.2 ft
Phosphorus34.5 µg/L13 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)No dataNo data
Maximum Depth20 ft57 ft
Surface Area539 acres1,057 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species56
Trophic Stateeutrophicoligotrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

Plum Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade B versus Lost Lake's Grade C. Water clarity: 14.2 ft vs 4.5 ft. For fishing diversity, Plum Lake also leads with 6 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.