Lost Lake vs Plum Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Plum Lake has a higher water quality grade (A, Excellent) than Lost Lake (C, Fair). Both are in Vilas County, Wisconsin.
Lost Lake and Plum Lake are both in Wisconsin — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. Plum Lake (A) is materially cleaner than Lost Lake (C). A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.
For a recreational visitor, the wider grade gap is decisive — Plum Lake is the better water-quality choice. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?
Lost Lake
Murky, only visible to about 4.5 ft.
Plum Lake
Good clarity, visible to about 14.5 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Lost Lake | Plum Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | C (Fair) | A (Excellent) |
| Water Clarity | 4.5 ft | 14.5 ft |
| Phosphorus | 35.3 µg/L | 12.7 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | 20 ft | 57 ft |
| Surface Area | 539 acres | 1.1K acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | oligotrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Plum Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade A versus Lost Lake's Grade C. Water clarity: 14.5 ft vs 4.5 ft. For fishing diversity, Plum Lake also leads with 0 species.