Lake Lucerne vs Lake Metonga
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Lake Lucerne and Lake Metonga read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Forest County, Wisconsin.
Both Lake Lucerne and Lake Metonga sit in Wisconsin. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. These two sit close on the readings, Lake Lucerne versus Lake Metonga. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Lake Lucerne
Crystal clear, you can see 18.7 ft down.
Lake Metonga
Crystal clear, you can see 22 ft down.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Lake Lucerne | Lake Metonga |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 18.7 ft | 22 ft Better |
| Phosphorus | 9.3 µg/L Better | 13.7 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | 73 ft | 79 ft Better |
| Surface Area | 1,039 acres | 2,038 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 6 Better | 5 |
| Trophic State | oligotrophic | oligotrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Lake Lucerne or Lake Metonga against a different lake.
Verdict
Both lakes earn the same Grade B. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Lake Lucerne: 18.7 ft, Lake Metonga: 22 ft) and what you want from the lake. Lake Lucerne supports more documented fish species.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.