Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Ida Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Upper Cormorant Lake. Both are in Becker County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Ida Lake and Upper Cormorant Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. Ida Lake reads materially cleaner than Upper Cormorant Lake on nutrients and algae. A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Ida Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Ida Lake

Becker County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 12.1 ft.

Upper Cormorant Lake

Becker County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 8 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricIda LakeUpper Cormorant Lake
Water Clarity12.1 ft Better8 ft
Phosphorus23 µg/L Better30 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)5.3 µg/L Better9.9 µg/L
Maximum Depth20 ft29 ft Better
Surface Area632 acres974 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species14 Better13
Trophic Statemesotrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Swap a lake

Compare Ida Lake or Upper Cormorant Lake against a different lake.

Verdict

Ida Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Upper Cormorant Lake. Water clarity: 12.1 ft vs 8 ft. For fishing diversity, Ida Lake also leads with 14 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.