Dixon Lake vs Round Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Dixon Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Round Lake. Both are in Itasca County, Minnesota.
Both Dixon Lake and Round Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. These two sit close on the readings, Dixon Lake versus Round Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Dixon Lake
Murky, only visible to about 6 ft.
Round Lake
Murky, only visible to about 4.1 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Dixon Lake | Round Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 6 ft Better | 4.1 ft |
| Phosphorus | 34 µg/L Better | 67 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 19.6 µg/L Better | 31.8 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | 29 ft Better | 24 ft |
| Surface Area | 622 acres | 2,860 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 15 | 17 Better |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | eutrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Dixon Lake or Round Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
Dixon Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Round Lake. Water clarity: 6 ft vs 4.1 ft. For more fish-species variety, Round Lake edges ahead with 17 documented species.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.