Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Dixon Lake vs Round Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Dixon Lake has a higher water quality grade (D, Poor) than Round Lake (F, Very Poor). Both are in Itasca County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Dixon Lake and Round Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Dixon Lake (D) versus Round Lake (F). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

D

Dixon Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 6 ft.

F

Round Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 4.1 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricDixon LakeRound Lake
Overall GradeD (Poor)F (Very Poor)
Water Clarity6 ft4.1 ft
Phosphorus34 µg/L67 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)19.6 µg/L31.8 µg/L
Maximum Depth29 ft24 ft
Surface Area622 acres2,860 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1517
Trophic Stateeutrophiceutrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

Dixon Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade D versus Round Lake's Grade F. Water clarity: 6 ft vs 4.1 ft. For more fish-species variety, Round Lake edges ahead with 17 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.