Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Ames Lake and Sand Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Itasca County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Ames Lake and Sand Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are close: Ames Lake and Sand Lake sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Ames Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 10 ft.

Sand Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 13.2 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricAmes LakeSand Lake
Water Clarity10 ft13.2 ft Better
Phosphorus15 µg/L Better18 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)2.3 µg/L Better3.1 µg/L
Maximum Depth51 ft60 ft Better
Surface Area564 acres715 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species13 Better0
Trophic Statemesotrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Swap a lake

Compare Ames Lake or Sand Lake against a different lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Ames Lake: 10 ft, Sand Lake: 13.2 ft) and what you want from the lake. Ames Lake supports more documented fish species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.