Long Branch L. Lake vs Thomas Hill Res. Nr. Dam Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Long Branch L. Lake has a higher water quality grade (C, Fair) than Thomas Hill Res. Nr. Dam Lake (D, Poor). Both are in Missouri.
Long Branch L. Lake and Thomas Hill Res. Nr. Dam Lake are both in Missouri — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The grades are close: Long Branch L. Lake (C) and Thomas Hill Res. Nr. Dam Lake (D) are within one letter of each other on the LakeGrade rubric. The per-parameter sub-grades below will show where the small differences actually live.
With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Long Branch L. Lake
No clarity data.
Thomas Hill Res. Nr. Dam Lake
Very murky, less than 2.3 ft of visibility.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Long Branch L. Lake | Thomas Hill Res. Nr. Dam Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | C (Fair) | D (Poor) |
| Water Clarity | No data | 2.3 ft |
| Phosphorus | 36 µg/L | 61 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | 14.2 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 2,430 acres | 3,500 acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Yes |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | eutrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Long Branch L. Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade C versus Thomas Hill Res. Nr. Dam Lake's Grade D. For fishing diversity, Long Branch L. Lake also leads with 0 species.