H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake vs Montrose Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake has a higher water quality grade (C, Fair) than Montrose Lake (F, Very Poor). Both are in Wisconsin.
H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake and Montrose Lake are both in Missouri — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake (C) is materially cleaner than Montrose Lake (F). A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.
For a recreational visitor, the wider grade gap is decisive — H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake is the better water-quality choice. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?
H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake
Murky, only visible to about 3.8 ft.
Montrose Lake
Very murky, less than 0.6 ft of visibility.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake | Montrose Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | C (Fair) | F (Very Poor) |
| Water Clarity | 3.8 ft | 0.6 ft |
| Phosphorus | 38.7 µg/L | 266 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 18.3 µg/L | 61.9 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 55.6K acres | 1.7K acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | hypereutrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade C versus Montrose Lake's Grade F. Water clarity: 3.8 ft vs 0.6 ft. For fishing diversity, H.S. Truman Res. Nr. Dam Lake also leads with 0 species.