Ham Lake vs Thomas Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Thomas Lake has a higher water quality grade (B, Good) than Ham Lake (D, Poor). Both are in Lake County, Minnesota.
Ham Lake and Thomas Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. Thomas Lake (B) is materially cleaner than Ham Lake (D). A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.
For a recreational visitor, the wider grade gap is decisive — Thomas Lake is the better water-quality choice. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?
Ham Lake
Murky, only visible to about 6 ft.
Thomas Lake
Good clarity, visible to about 14 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Ham Lake | Thomas Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | D (Poor) | B (Good) |
| Water Clarity | 6 ft | 14 ft |
| Phosphorus | No data | No data |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | 53 ft | 110 ft |
| Surface Area | 1.5K acres | 1.5K acres |
| Public Access | No | No |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | oligotrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Thomas Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade B versus Ham Lake's Grade D. Water clarity: 14 ft vs 6 ft. For fishing diversity, Thomas Lake also leads with 0 species.