Ash Lake vs Big Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Big Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Ash Lake. Both are in St. Louis County, Minnesota.
Both Ash Lake and Big Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. Big Lake reads materially cleaner than Ash Lake on nutrients and algae. A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.
For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Big Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?
Ash Lake
Murky, only visible to about 5.5 ft.
Big Lake
Moderate clarity, visible to about 8.2 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Ash Lake | Big Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 5.5 ft | 8.2 ft Better |
| Phosphorus | 39 µg/L | 14 µg/L Better |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 11.1 µg/L | 4.9 µg/L Better |
| Maximum Depth | 25 ft Better | 22 ft |
| Surface Area | 690 acres | 1,904 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 9 Better | 8 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | mesotrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Ash Lake or Big Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
Big Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Ash Lake. Water clarity: 8.2 ft vs 5.5 ft. For more fish-species variety, Ash Lake edges ahead with 9 documented species.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.