Blue Spring Lake
- ++2.2 ft water clarity
- +Lower phosphorus (24.7 vs 44.1 µg/L)

5 lakes with lower nutrient and algae readings nearby, ranked by the size of the improvement and by proximity.
Lower Spring Lake carries nutrient and algae readings on record. Within 30 miles, 5 lakes read lower. Blue Spring Lake (Jefferson County) is the closest meaningful upgrade.
Stays via Stay22
Compare cabins, hotels, and vacation rentals around Lower Spring Lake in Wisconsin. The 5 lakes above sit within 30 miles, so one base reaches them all. Switch the map to Satellite to see how close each stay is to the water.
Top-rated places to stay near Lower Spring Lake
Prices for Oct 16–18, 4 adults. Change dates on the map below.
Availability and prices from Stay22 partners (Booking.com, Vrbo, Expedia). We may earn a commission from bookings, at no extra cost to you.
Planning a trip to Lower Spring Lake?
Get lake water-quality updates plus the best cabin & lodging deals near Lower Spring Lake — straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
5 cleaner lakes sit within 30 miles of Lower Spring Lake in the EPA water-quality dataset. With that many lower-nutrient neighbors close by, Lower Spring Lake's readings reflect something specific to the lake itself, not a regional water-quality ceiling. The neighbor list below isn't a small set of marginal upgrades; it's a real cohort of meaningfully cleaner choices for the same Wisconsin weekend.
The closest cleaner alternative, Blue Spring Lake in Jefferson County, sits miles from Lower Spring Lake. At that distance, the substitution cost is essentially zero: same drive time, same regional access, demonstrably cleaner water on the EPA indicators. For repeat visitors who care about clarity or phosphorus levels, swapping the routine to Blue Spring Lake is mostly a habit change rather than a logistics change.
Each lake's nutrient and algae readings — total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity — are shown beside the EPA National Lakes Assessment 2022 condition class for that lake's own ecoregion, so a reading is compared against the lakes it would naturally resemble. LakeQuality publishes no letter grade. Lower readings mean measurably less nutrient and algae in the water, not better scenery or access: the lake with the clearest, lowest-nutrient water can have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a neighbor, so the comparison is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. How the readings are classified is on our methodology page.
Sampled lakes on LakeQuality carry readings from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with strictly lower nutrient and algae readings, then rank by the size of the improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.