Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Cleaner Lakes Than Leota Lake

2 higher-graded lakes within 30 miles, ranked by grade improvement and proximity.

Leota Lake carries a Grade D (Nutrient-rich) water quality score. Within 30 miles, 2 lakes hold a higher grade. Lake Waubesa (Dane County, Grade B, null mi away) is the closest meaningful upgrade.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated
1
B

Lake Waubesa

Dane County, Wisconsin · mi from Leota Lake
  • +Two grade letters higher (D → B)
  • ++1.7 ft water clarity
  • +Lower phosphorus (36.6 vs 77 µg/L)
2
C

Clear Lake

Rock County, Wisconsin · mi from Leota Lake
  • +Higher grade (D → C)
  • ++1.3 ft water clarity
  • +Lower phosphorus (38.5 vs 77 µg/L)

Reading the cohort

Only 2 lakes within a 30-mile radius score better than Leota Lake's Grade D. The narrow set of options reflects either a fairly clean lake to begin with or a region without a wide range of cleaner alternatives — the trip-planning decision is more constrained than the headline "cleaner lakes nearby" suggests.

The closest cleaner alternative — Lake Waubesa in Dane County, Grade B — sits miles from Leota Lake. At that distance, the substitution cost is essentially zero: same drive time, same regional access, demonstrably cleaner water on the EPA indicators. For repeat visitors who care about clarity or phosphorus levels, swapping the routine to Lake Waubesa is mostly a habit change rather than a logistics change.

The EPA water-quality grading combines clarity (Secchi depth), phosphorus, and chlorophyll-a measurements from state environmental sampling. A higher letter grade reflects measurably cleaner water on those indicators, not subjective beauty or access quality — a Grade A lake might have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a Grade C neighbor, so the ranking is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. See the methodology page for the full grading formula.

How this list is built

Rated lakes on LakeQuality have a letter from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with a strictly higher numeric score, then rank by grade improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.