Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Lake Kegonsa carries nutrient and algae readings on record. Within 30 miles, 3 lakes read lower. Lake Waubesa (Dane County) is the closest meaningful upgrade.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated
1

Lake Waubesa

Dane County, Wisconsin · near Lake Kegonsa
  • +Lower phosphorus (36.6 vs 59.5 µg/L)
2

Lake Wingra

Dane County, Wisconsin · near Lake Kegonsa
  • +Lower phosphorus (33.8 vs 59.5 µg/L)
3

Red Cedar Lake

Jefferson County, Wisconsin · near Lake Kegonsa
  • +Lower phosphorus (23.4 vs 59.5 µg/L)

Stays via Stay22

Where to stay near Lake Kegonsa

Compare cabins, hotels, and vacation rentals around Lake Kegonsa in Wisconsin. The 3 lakes above sit within 30 miles, so one base reaches them all. Switch the map to Satellite to see how close each stay is to the water.

Top-rated places to stay near Lake Kegonsa

Prices for Oct 9–11, 4 adults. Change dates on the map below.

Availability and prices from Stay22 partners (Booking.com, Vrbo, Expedia). We may earn a commission from bookings, at no extra cost to you.

Planning a trip to Lake Kegonsa?

Get lake water-quality updates plus the best cabin & lodging deals near Lake Kegonsa — straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Reading the cohort

Within 30 miles of Lake Kegonsa, 3 lakes carry lower nutrient and algae readings on the EPA water-quality metrics. The short list means the alternatives are real upgrades but not interchangeable: each carries its own access, size, and species mix worth checking before substituting it into a weekend plan.

The closest cleaner alternative, Lake Waubesa in Dane County, sits miles from Lake Kegonsa. At that distance, the substitution cost is essentially zero: same drive time, same regional access, demonstrably cleaner water on the EPA indicators. For repeat visitors who care about clarity or phosphorus levels, swapping the routine to Lake Waubesa is mostly a habit change rather than a logistics change.

Each lake's nutrient and algae readings — total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity — are shown beside the EPA National Lakes Assessment 2022 condition class for that lake's own ecoregion, so a reading is compared against the lakes it would naturally resemble. LakeQuality publishes no letter grade. Lower readings mean measurably less nutrient and algae in the water, not better scenery or access: the lake with the clearest, lowest-nutrient water can have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a neighbor, so the comparison is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. How the readings are classified is on our methodology page.

How this list is built

Sampled lakes on LakeQuality carry readings from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with strictly lower nutrient and algae readings, then rank by the size of the improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.