Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Cleaner Lakes Than East Arctic Lake

5 higher-graded lakes within 30 miles, ranked by grade improvement and proximity.

East Arctic Lake carries a Grade F (Algae-prone) water quality score. Within 30 miles, 5 lakes hold a higher grade. Upper Prior Lake (Scott County, Grade C, null mi away) is the closest meaningful upgrade.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated
1
C

Upper Prior Lake

Scott County, Minnesota · mi from East Arctic Lake
  • +Two grade letters higher (F → C)
  • +Lower phosphorus (38.7 vs 94.5 µg/L)
2
C

Central Mystic Lake

Scott County, Minnesota · mi from East Arctic Lake
  • +Two grade letters higher (F → C)
  • +Lower phosphorus (33.5 vs 94.5 µg/L)
3
C

Lower Prior Lake

Scott County, Minnesota · mi from East Arctic Lake
  • +Two grade letters higher (F → C)
  • +Lower phosphorus (27 vs 94.5 µg/L)
4
D

Spring Lake

Scott County, Minnesota · mi from East Arctic Lake
  • +Higher grade (F → D)
  • +Lower phosphorus (64.6 vs 94.5 µg/L)
5
D

Pike Lake

Scott County, Minnesota · mi from East Arctic Lake
  • +Higher grade (F → D)

Reading the cohort

5 cleaner lakes sit within 30 miles of East Arctic Lake in the EPA water-quality dataset. With that many higher-grade neighbors close by, East Arctic Lake's Grade F reflects something specific to the lake itself — not a regional water-quality ceiling. The neighbor list below isn't a small set of marginal upgrades; it's a real cohort of meaningfully cleaner choices for the same Minnesota weekend.

The closest cleaner alternative — Upper Prior Lake in Scott County, Grade C — sits miles from East Arctic Lake. At that distance, the substitution cost is essentially zero: same drive time, same regional access, demonstrably cleaner water on the EPA indicators. For repeat visitors who care about clarity or phosphorus levels, swapping the routine to Upper Prior Lake is mostly a habit change rather than a logistics change.

The EPA water-quality grading combines clarity (Secchi depth), phosphorus, and chlorophyll-a measurements from state environmental sampling. A higher letter grade reflects measurably cleaner water on those indicators, not subjective beauty or access quality — a Grade A lake might have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a Grade C neighbor, so the ranking is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. See the methodology page for the full grading formula.

How this list is built

Rated lakes on LakeQuality have a letter from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with a strictly higher numeric score, then rank by grade improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.