Skip to main content
LakeQuality

White Bear Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Pool of Lake St Croix. Both are in Washington County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Pool of Lake St Croix and White Bear Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. White Bear Lake reads materially cleaner than Pool of Lake St Croix on nutrients and algae. A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: White Bear Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Pool of Lake St Croix

Washington County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 4.3 ft.

White Bear Lake

Washington County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 14.4 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricPool of Lake St CroixWhite Bear Lake
Water Clarity4.3 ft14.4 ft Better
Phosphorus39.2 µg/L15 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)No data2.7 µg/L
Maximum Depth78 ft83 ft Better
Surface Area8,393 acres2,428 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species36 Better18
Trophic Stateeutrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

White Bear Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Pool of Lake St Croix. Water clarity: 14.4 ft vs 4.3 ft. For more fish-species variety, Pool of Lake St Croix edges ahead with 36 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.