Pool vs White Bear Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
White Bear Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Pool. Both are in Washington County, Minnesota.
Pool and White Bear Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two sit close on the readings, Pool versus White Bear Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Pool
Murky, only visible to about 5.9 ft.
White Bear Lake
Good clarity, visible to about 14.4 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Pool | White Bear Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 5.9 ft | 14.4 ft Better |
| Phosphorus | 31.1 µg/L | 15 µg/L Better |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | 2.7 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | 78 ft | 83 ft Better |
| Surface Area | 8,393 acres | 2,428 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 36 Better | 18 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | mesotrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Pool or White Bear Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
White Bear Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Pool. Water clarity: 14.4 ft vs 5.9 ft. For more fish-species variety, Pool edges ahead with 36 documented species.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.