Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Buchanan Lake and Rush Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Otter Tail County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Buchanan Lake and Rush Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are close: Buchanan Lake and Rush Lake sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Buchanan Lake

Otter Tail County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 5.5 ft.

Rush Lake

Otter Tail County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 7.5 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricBuchanan LakeRush Lake
Water Clarity5.5 ft7.5 ft Better
Phosphorus22 µg/L Better27 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)12.3 µg/L9.8 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth42 ft68 ft Better
Surface Area964 acres5,276 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species819 Better
Trophic Stateeutrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade C. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Buchanan Lake: 5.5 ft, Rush Lake: 7.5 ft) and what you want from the lake. Buchanan Lake has fewer fish species than Rush Lake.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.