Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Birch Lake vs Lower Sucker Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Birch Lake and Lower Sucker Lake both received the same overall water quality grade of A (Excellent). Both are in Cass County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Birch Lake and Lower Sucker Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Birch Lake (A) versus Lower Sucker Lake (A). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

A

Birch Lake

Cass County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 14 ft.

A

Lower Sucker Lake

Cass County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 8.3 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricBirch LakeLower Sucker Lake
Overall GradeA (Excellent)A (Excellent)
Water Clarity14 ft8.3 ft
Phosphorus12 µg/L21 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)4 µg/L6.5 µg/L
Maximum Depth45 ft35 ft
Surface Area1,267 acres592 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1414
Trophic Statemesotrophicmesotrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Birch Lake: 14 ft, Lower Sucker Lake: 8.3 ft) and what you want from the lake. Birch Lake matches its peer on species count.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.