Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Birch Lake and Kabekona Bay Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Cass County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Birch Lake and Kabekona Bay Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The readings are close: Birch Lake and Kabekona Bay Lake sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Birch Lake

Cass County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 14 ft.

Kabekona Bay Lake

Cass County, Minnesota

Crystal clear, you can see 17.2 ft down.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricBirch LakeKabekona Bay Lake
Water Clarity14 ft17.2 ft Better
Phosphorus12 µg/L10 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)4 µg/L2.7 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth45 ft150 ft Better
Surface Area1,267 acres103,444 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1418 Better
Trophic Statemesotrophicoligotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Birch Lake: 14 ft, Kabekona Bay Lake: 17.2 ft) and what you want from the lake. Birch Lake has fewer fish species than Kabekona Bay Lake.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.