Impaired Lakes in Texas
33 of 129 graded Texas lakes (26%) are officially listed as impaired under Clean Water Act §303(d) in the most recent EPA ATTAINS reporting cycle.
Top Causes of Impairment in Texas
Reading the Texas impairment landscape
Texas reports 33 impaired lakes — 26% of the state's 129 tracked water bodies. That share is high enough to make impairment a meaningful planning concern: roughly one in four lakes carries at least one §303(d) listing for a pollutant exceeding standards. The list below isn't a niche concern — it's a significant chunk of the state's surface-water inventory.
The leading impairment cause in Texas is Algal growth. Each impairment category carries its own use-restriction implications — some affect fish consumption, some affect swimming, some affect aquatic-life habitat. Click through to the specific lake records below for the pollutant list and the TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) status, which determines whether a cleanup plan is in place.
Impaired-waters listings come from the state environmental agency's §303(d) submission to EPA, refreshed on a roughly 2-year cycle. A listed lake stays on the list until either a TMDL is established and the cleanup completes, or subsequent monitoring shows the pollutant concentrations no longer exceed water-quality standards. The list below reflects the most recent available Texas submission to the EPA Assessment, Total Maximum Daily Load Tracking and Implementation System (ATTAINS) dataset.
All 33 EPA-Listed Impaired Lakes in Texas
| Lake | County | Grade | Causes | TMDL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake Meredith | Hutchinson | A | Mercury, Salinity / chlorides | — |
| Lake Daingerfield Headwaters | Morris | A | Mercury | — |
| Lake Alan Henry | Garza | A | Mercury | — |
| Lake Sweetwater Mid Lake | Nolan | B | Salinity / chlorides | — |
| Lynchburg Reservoir | Harris | C | Dioxins, PCBs | — |
| Lake Coleman | Coleman | C | Algal growth | — |
| B A Steinhagen Reservoir | Jasper | C | Dioxins, Mercury | — |
| Houston County Lake | Houston | C | Algal growth | — |
| Sam Rayburn Reservoir | San Augustine | C | Algal growth, Dioxins, Mercury | — |
| Lake Tyler E | Smith | C | Algal growth | — |
| Upper Pat Mayse Reservoir | Lamar | C | Algal growth | — |
| Pat Mayse Reservoir | Lamar | C | Algal growth | — |
| Livingston Reservoir | Polk | D | Dioxins, PCBs | — |
| White River Lake | Crosby | D | Salinity / chlorides | — |
| Lake Graham | Young | D | Algal growth | — |
| Shallow Prong Lake | Jefferson | D | Oxygen depletion (low DO) | — |
| Lake Palestine | Smith | F | pH / acidity | — |
| Lake Crook Mid Lake | Lamar | F | Algal growth | — |
| Lake O the Pines Mid Lake | Marion | F | pH / acidity | — |
| Lake Cypress Springs Mid Lake | Franklin | F | Algal growth, pH / acidity | — |
| Pat Cleburne Reservoir | Johnson | F | Algal growth | — |
| Upper Lake Palestine | Smith | F | pH / acidity | — |
| Lake Opines | Marion | F | pH / acidity | — |
| Lake Somerville Mid Lake | Burleson | F | pH / acidity | — |
| Greenbelt Lake | Donley | NR | Algal growth | — |
| Lake Kemp | Baylor | NR | Algal growth | — |
| Canyon Lake Headwaters | Comal | NR | Mercury | — |
| Ellison Creek Reservoir | Morris | NR | Dioxins, PCBs, Total toxics | — |
| Canyon Lake | Comal | NR | Mercury | — |
| Lake Mackenzie | Briscoe | NR | Salinity / chlorides | — |
| Rita Blanca Lake | Hartley | NR | Oxygen depletion (low DO), pH / acidity | — |
| Clinton Lake | Marion | NR | Mercury, Oxygen depletion (low DO) | — |
| Caddo Lake Dwight Shellmans Home | Marion | NR | Mercury, Oxygen depletion (low DO) | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
How many lakes are impaired in Texas?
33 of 129 graded Texas lakes (26%) are listed as impaired in the most recent EPA ATTAINS reporting cycle. Of those, 33 are on the federal Clean Water Act §303(d) list and 0 have an approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) restoration plan.
What does Clean Water Act §303(d) mean?
Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act requires every state to identify waters that don't meet water quality standards even after pollution control measures. Each listed water must then have a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) developed — a plan that caps how much of each pollutant can enter the waterbody. The "303(d) list" is the impaired-waters list. The EPA reviews each state's list every two years.
What are the top causes of impairment in Texas?
The most common causes flagged across Texas's impaired lakes are: Algal growth (12 lakes); Mercury (9 lakes); pH / acidity (7 lakes); Dioxins (5 lakes); Salinity / chlorides (4 lakes); Oxygen depletion (low DO) (4 lakes). Mercury is widespread in fish tissue across the upper Midwest from atmospheric deposition. Nutrient impairment (phosphorus, nitrogen) typically reflects agricultural runoff and urban stormwater.
Can I swim in an impaired lake?
It depends on the cause of impairment. A lake impaired for "mercury in fish tissue" is generally safe to swim in — the warning is about long-term consumption of fish. A lake impaired for "pathogens" (E. coli) or "algal growth" may pose a swimming risk and often has a separate beach advisory. Check the cause categories listed for each lake below, and consult your state health department's beach monitoring program for current advisories.
Where does this impairment data come from?
Every impairment record on this page comes from the EPA's ATTAINS (Assessment and TMDL Tracking and Implementation System) public dataset, the federal repository of state-reported water quality assessments. EPA ATTAINS is published as GeoParquet files on the EPA Office of Water S3 bucket and refreshed several times per year. Causes and use-support codes follow EPA's standard taxonomy.
More on impaired waters
What it means when a lake is listed as impaired, why mercury is the most common reason, and why a listed lake can still be clear water with a good grade.
Why states issue fish-consumption advisories, which contaminants — mercury, PCBs, PFAS — drive them, and how to eat the fish you catch more safely.
How phosphorus and nutrient runoff drive algae growth and turn lakes green, where the nutrients come from, and what it means for a lake's grade.
Which lakes are actually improving: multi-year EPA monitoring trends, the named recoveries still in progress, and what it takes to move a letter grade.
Data source
Impairment data from the EPA ATTAINS (Assessment and TMDL Tracking and Implementation System) public dataset. Assessment unit IDs are matched to LakeQuality lakes by name and proximity; some lakes may not appear here if their ATTAINS name doesn't match our naming convention. For an official query, consult Texas's state water-quality agency.