Rush Lake vs South Lindstrom Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
South Lindstrom Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Rush Lake. Both are in Chisago County, Minnesota.
Both Rush Lake and South Lindstrom Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. South Lindstrom Lake reads materially cleaner than Rush Lake on nutrients and algae. A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.
For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: South Lindstrom Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?
Rush Lake
Very murky, less than 3 ft of visibility.
South Lindstrom Lake
Murky, only visible to about 5.6 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Rush Lake | South Lindstrom Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 3 ft | 5.6 ft Better |
| Phosphorus | 55.5 µg/L | 16 µg/L Better |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 31.4 µg/L | 6.1 µg/L Better |
| Maximum Depth | 24 ft | 34 ft Better |
| Surface Area | 1,494 acres | 455 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 16 Better | 14 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | mesotrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Rush Lake or South Lindstrom Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
South Lindstrom Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Rush Lake. Water clarity: 5.6 ft vs 3 ft. For more fish-species variety, Rush Lake edges ahead with 16 documented species.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.