Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Chisago Lake vs South Lindstrom Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

South Lindstrom Lake has a higher water quality grade (A, Excellent) than Chisago Lake (D, Poor). Both are in Chisago County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Chisago Lake and South Lindstrom Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. South Lindstrom Lake (A) is materially cleaner than Chisago Lake (D). A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.

For a recreational visitor, the wider grade gap is decisive — South Lindstrom Lake is the better water-quality choice. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

D

Chisago Lake

Chisago County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 4 ft.

A

South Lindstrom Lake

Chisago County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 5.6 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricChisago LakeSouth Lindstrom Lake
Overall GradeD (Poor)A (Excellent)
Water Clarity4 ft5.6 ft
Phosphorus25.5 µg/L16 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)14.9 µg/L6.1 µg/L
Maximum Depth34 ft34 ft
Surface Area944 acres455 acres
Public AccessNoYes
Fish Species1414
Trophic Stateeutrophicmesotrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

South Lindstrom Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade A versus Chisago Lake's Grade D. Water clarity: 5.6 ft vs 4 ft. For fishing diversity, South Lindstrom Lake also leads with 14 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.