Little Dixie Lk. Lake vs Phillips Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Phillips Lake has a higher water quality grade (C, Fair) than Little Dixie Lk. Lake (F, Very Poor). Both are in Wisconsin.
Both Little Dixie Lk. Lake and Phillips Lake sit in Missouri. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. Phillips Lake (C) is materially cleaner than Little Dixie Lk. Lake (F). A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.
For a recreational visitor, the wider grade gap is decisive — Phillips Lake is the better water-quality choice. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?
Little Dixie Lk. Lake
Very murky, less than 1.7 ft of visibility.
Phillips Lake
Very murky, less than 2.8 ft of visibility.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Little Dixie Lk. Lake | Phillips Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | F (Very Poor) | C (Fair) |
| Water Clarity | 1.7 ft | 2.8 ft |
| Phosphorus | 67 µg/L | 35.5 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 36.4 µg/L | 8.8 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 196 acres | 33 acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | eutrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Phillips Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade C versus Little Dixie Lk. Lake's Grade F. Water clarity: 2.8 ft vs 1.7 ft. For fishing diversity, Phillips Lake also leads with 0 species.