Skip to main content
LakeQuality

South Lindstrom Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Goose Lake. Both are in Chisago County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Goose Lake and South Lindstrom Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are meaningfully apart: South Lindstrom Lake carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Goose Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: South Lindstrom Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Goose Lake

Chisago County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 4.5 ft.

South Lindstrom Lake

Chisago County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 5.6 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricGoose LakeSouth Lindstrom Lake
Water Clarity4.5 ft5.6 ft Better
Phosphorus30.5 µg/L16 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)11.5 µg/L6.1 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth55 ft Better34 ft
Surface Area732 acres455 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species15 Better14
Trophic Stateeutrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

South Lindstrom Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Goose Lake. Water clarity: 5.6 ft vs 4.5 ft. For more fish-species variety, Goose Lake edges ahead with 15 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.