Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Garfield Lake vs Kabekona Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Garfield Lake and Kabekona Lake both received the same overall water quality grade of A (Excellent). Both are in Hubbard County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Garfield Lake and Kabekona Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. The grades are close: Garfield Lake (A) and Kabekona Lake (A) are within one letter of each other on the LakeGrade rubric. The per-parameter sub-grades below will show where the small differences actually live.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

A

Garfield Lake

Hubbard County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 9.5 ft.

A

Kabekona Lake

Hubbard County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 12.1 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricGarfield LakeKabekona Lake
Overall GradeA (Excellent)A (Excellent)
Water Clarity9.5 ft12.1 ft
Phosphorus19 µg/L11 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)4.8 µg/L2.6 µg/L
Maximum Depth32 ft133 ft
Surface Area972 acres2,433 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1220
Trophic Statemesotrophicoligotrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Garfield Lake: 9.5 ft, Kabekona Lake: 12.1 ft) and what you want from the lake. Garfield Lake has fewer fish species than Kabekona Lake.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.