Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Boulder Lake and High Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Vilas County, Wisconsin.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Boulder Lake and High Lake sit in Wisconsin. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. These two sit close on the readings, Boulder Lake versus High Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Boulder Lake

Vilas County, Wisconsin

Murky, only visible to about 5.6 ft.

High Lake

Vilas County, Wisconsin

Good clarity, visible to about 10 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricBoulder LakeHigh Lake
Water Clarity5.6 ft10 ft Better
Phosphorus21.6 µg/L14.1 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)No dataNo data
Maximum Depth23 ft36 ft Better
Surface Area516 acres741 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species66
Trophic Stateeutrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade B. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Boulder Lake: 5.6 ft, High Lake: 10 ft) and what you want from the lake. Boulder Lake matches its peer on species count.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.