1
Mole Lake
Forest County, Wisconsin · near Rolling Stone Lake
- ++2.8 ft water clarity
- +Lower phosphorus (15.6 vs 33.1 µg/L)
Cleaner Lakes Than Rolling Stone Lake
4 lakes with lower nutrient and algae readings nearby, ranked by the size of the improvement and by proximity.
Rolling Stone Lake carries nutrient and algae readings on record. Within 30 miles, 4 lakes read lower. Mole Lake (Forest County) is the closest meaningful upgrade.
Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated
2
Pickerel Lake
Forest County, Wisconsin · near Rolling Stone Lake
- ++4.3 ft water clarity
- +Lower phosphorus (20.4 vs 33.1 µg/L)
3
Crane Lake
Forest County, Wisconsin · near Rolling Stone Lake
- ++1.3 ft water clarity
- +Lower phosphorus (22 vs 33.1 µg/L)
4
St. Johns Lake
Forest County, Wisconsin · near Rolling Stone Lake
- ++4.3 ft water clarity
- +Lower phosphorus (14.9 vs 33.1 µg/L)
Stays via Stay22
Where to stay near Rolling Stone Lake
Compare cabins, hotels, and vacation rentals around Rolling Stone Lake in Wisconsin. The 4 lakes above sit within 30 miles, so one base reaches them all. Switch the map to Satellite to see how close each stay is to the water.
Top-rated places to stay near Rolling Stone Lake
Prices for Oct 9–11, 4 adults. Change dates on the map below.
Availability and prices from Stay22 partners (Booking.com, Vrbo, Expedia). We may earn a commission from bookings, at no extra cost to you.
Planning a trip to Rolling Stone Lake?
Get lake water-quality updates plus the best cabin & lodging deals near Rolling Stone Lake — straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Reading the cohort
4 cleaner lakes sit within 30 miles of Rolling Stone Lake in the EPA water-quality dataset. With that many lower-nutrient neighbors close by, Rolling Stone Lake's readings reflect something specific to the lake itself, not a regional water-quality ceiling. The neighbor list below isn't a small set of marginal upgrades; it's a real cohort of meaningfully cleaner choices for the same Wisconsin weekend.
The closest cleaner alternative, Mole Lake in Forest County, sits miles from Rolling Stone Lake. At that distance, the substitution cost is essentially zero: same drive time, same regional access, demonstrably cleaner water on the EPA indicators. For repeat visitors who care about clarity or phosphorus levels, swapping the routine to Mole Lake is mostly a habit change rather than a logistics change.
Each lake's nutrient and algae readings — total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity — are shown beside the EPA National Lakes Assessment 2022 condition class for that lake's own ecoregion, so a reading is compared against the lakes it would naturally resemble. LakeQuality publishes no letter grade. Lower readings mean measurably less nutrient and algae in the water, not better scenery or access: the lake with the clearest, lowest-nutrient water can have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a neighbor, so the comparison is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. How the readings are classified is on our methodology page.
How this list is built
Sampled lakes on LakeQuality carry readings from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with strictly lower nutrient and algae readings, then rank by the size of the improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.