Little Cut Foot Lake vs Sand Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Sand Lake has a higher water quality grade (A, Excellent) than Little Cut Foot Lake (D, Poor). Both are in Itasca County, Minnesota.
D
Little Cut Foot Lake
Itasca County, Minnesota
Murky, only visible to about 5.5 ft.
A
Sand Lake
Itasca County, Minnesota
Good clarity, visible to about 13 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Little Cut Foot Lake | Sand Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | D (Poor) | A (Excellent) |
| Water Clarity | 5.5 ft | 13 ft |
| Phosphorus | No data | 18 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | 20 ft | 60 ft |
| Surface Area | 619.1 acres | 714.55 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | No |
| Fish Species | 15 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | mesotrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Sand Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade A versus Little Cut Foot Lake's Grade D. Water clarity: 13 ft vs 5.5 ft. For more fish-species variety, Little Cut Foot Lake edges ahead with 15 documented species.